2026-10-282026-10-282025-09-09OLIVEIRA, Ana Jéssica Rêgo Ferreira de. O Impacto da regulamentação do PL 3/2025 no processo estrutural e nos direitos fundamentais. Orientadora: Gisele Santos Fernandes Góes. 2025. 41 f. Trabalho de Curso (Bacharelado em Direito) – Faculdade de Direito, Instituto de Ciências Jurídicas, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, 2025. Disponível em: . Acesso em:.https://bdm.ufpa.br/handle/prefix/10456This paper analyzes the recent regulation of structural processes in Brazil, specifically through Bill No. 3/2025, which aims to consolidate procedural instruments capable of addressing disputes related to the enforcement of fundamental rights, the implementation of public policies, and the overcoming of systemic flaws in the functioning of public and private structures. The central problem of the research consists of evaluating to what extent the structural process presents itself as the most appropriate proposal for organizing the various individual disputes that repeatedly provoke excessive judicialization in the Judiciary. The overall objective is to analyze the orientation of the structural process in Brazilian procedural law, highlighting its role in the realization of fundamental rights. To this end, the research developed three specific objectives: (i) to investigate the precedents of the Supreme Federal Court (STF) that consolidated the recognition of the use of structural processes in Brazil and their practical implications; (ii) to identify the main characteristics of structural disputes and the contemporary procedural techniques employed to resolve them; and (iii) to evaluate the legislative proposal for processing, examining its potential impacts on the methods and techniques already consolidated in current legislation. The methodology used is qualitative, based on bibliographic research and doctrinal analysis of reference authors on the subject of structural processes. The results reveal that the Center for Complex Structural Processes (NUPEC) at the Supreme Federal Court (STF), the specialized centers of the Courts, and the support and monitoring bodies to be established by the Public Prosecutor's Offices are notable examples of how the jurisdictional function has sought to expand to encompass the management of structural solutions and the oversight of their effectiveness over time. Therefore, the discussion highlights that structural litigation is residual in nature, being applied when traditional procedural instruments prove insufficient to deal with large-scale problems. It is concluded that Bill No. 3/2025 represents a highly relevant regulatory initiative, as it fills the existing legislative gap regarding the treatment of structural litigation in the Brazilian legal system.Acesso AbertoProcessos estruturaisProjeto de lei nº 03/2025Direitos fundamentaisPoder judiciárioTécnicas processuais estruturaisStructural processesBill no. 03/2025Fundamental rightsJudiciaryStructural procedural techniquesCNPQ::CIENCIAS SOCIAIS APLICADAS::DIREITOTrabalho de Curso - Graduação - MonografiaAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil